|San José State University|
& Tornado Alley
The Nature of the So-Called|
Nuclear Strong Force
The nucleonic force is not exclusive but in the interaction between two nucleons the energy associated with the formation of a spin pair is many times larger than that involved in their interaction through the nucleonic force. In a nucleus having many nucleons the magnitude of the energies of the many interactions may exceed those of the spin pair formations.
The sawtooth pattern is a result of the enhancement of incremental binding energy due to the formation of neutron-neutron spin pairs. The regularity of the sawtooth pattern demonstrates that one and only one neutron-neutron spin pair is formed when a neutron is added to a nuclide.
Here is the graph for the case of the isotopes of Krypton (proton number 36).
There is a sharp drop when the number of neutrons exceeds the proton number of 36. This illustrates that when a neutron is added there is a neutron-proton spin pair formed as long as there is an unpaired proton available and none after that. This illustrates the exclusivity of neutron-proton spin pair formation. It also shows that a neutron-proton spin pair is formed at the same time that a neutron-neutron spin pair is formed.
The case of an odd proton number is of interest. Here is the graph for the isotopes of Rubidium (proton number 37).
The addition of the 38th neutron brings the effect of a neutron-neutron pair but a neutron-proton pair is not formed, as was the case up to and including the 37th neutron. The effects almost but not exactly cancel each out. It is notable that the binding energies involved in the two types of nucleonic pairs are almost exactly the same.
This same pattern is seen in the case for the isotopes of Bromine.
If the incremental binding energy of neutrons decreases as the number of neutrons in the nuclide increases then it is evidence that the interaction of a neutron and another neutron is due to repulsion. That is to say, neutrons.
Let the nucleonic charge of a proton be designated as +1 and that of a neutron as q. Thus q is the nucleonic charge of the neutron relative to that of a proton. The best estimate of q is as −2/3. In any case it is of opposite sign from that of a proton and smaller in magnitude.
It is to be emphasized that the above depiction is only a schematic. The actual spatial arrangement is quite different. For illustration consider the corresponding schematic for an alpha particle and its spatial arrangement.
The sharp drop off in the incremental binding energy of neutrons after 41 indicates that a shell was filled and the 42nd neutron pair had to go into a higher shell.
Maria Goeppert Mayer and Hans Jensen established a set of numbers of nucleons corresponding to filled shells of (2, 8, 20, 28, 50, 82, 126). Those were based on the relative numbers of stable isotopes. The physicist, Eugene Wigner, dubbed them magic numbers and the name stuck..
In the above graph the sharp drop off in incremental binding energy after 41 neutron pairs corresponds to 82 neutronsk, a magic number
Analysis in terms of Incremental binding energies reveal that 6 and 14 are also magic numbers. If 8 and 20 are considered the values for filled subshells then a simple algorithm expains the sequence (2, 6, 14, 28, 50, 82, 126).
These alpha module rings rotate in four modes. They rotate as a vortex ring to keep the neutrons and protons (which are attracted to each other) separate. The vortex ring also rotates like a wheel about an axis through its center and perpendicular to its plane. Furthermore the vortex ring also rotates like a flipped coin about two different diameters perpendicular to each other.
The above animation shows the different modes of rotation occurring sequentially but physically they occur simultaneously. (The pattern on the torus ring is just the wheel-like rotation to be observed.)
Aage Bohr and Dan Mottleson found that the angular momentum of a nucleus (moment
of inertia times the rate of rotation) is quantized to
h is Planck's constant divided by 2π and I is a positive integer. Using this result
the rates of rotation were found to be
billions of times per second. Because of the complexity of the four modes of rotation each nucleon
is effectively smeared throughout a spherical shell. So, although the static structure of a nuclear shell is that
of a ring, its dynamic appearance is that of a spherical shell.
Without loss of generality the force between two nucleons can be represented as
where s is the separation distance between them, H is a constant, q1 and q2 are the nucleonic charges and f(s) is a function of distance. For the nucleonic force it is presumed that f(s) is a positive but declining function of distance. This means that the nucleonic force drops off more rapidly than the electrostatic force between protons.
When one spherical shell is located interior to another of the same charge the equilibrium is where
the centers of the two shells coincide. If there is a deviation from this arrangement the increased repulsion
from the areas of spheres which are closer together is greater than the decrease in repulsion from
the areas which are farther apart. This only occurs for the case in which f(s) is a declining function.
If f(s) is constant there is no net force when one sphere is entirely enclosed within the other. For more
on this surprising yet obvious result see Repelling spheres.
What conventional theory calls the nuclear strong force is made up of two disparate phenomena: Exclusive spin pairing and non-exclusive interaction of nucleons.
In a nucleus wherever possible the nucleons are linked together through spin pair formation into rings of alpha modules which rotate in four different modes at rapid rates. This rapid rotation results in each nucleon being effectively smeared uniformly throughout a spherical shell.
The nucleons are organized in spherical shells containing at most certain numbers of nucleons. These nuclear magic numbers are explained by a simple algorithm.
Dynamically a nucleus is basically composed of concentric spherical shells which repel each other. This mutual repulsion results in a stable arrangement in which the centers of the concentric spherical shells coincide.
Thus a nucleus is held together by the linkages created by the formation of spin pairs. The rings of alpha modules rotate to create the dynamic appearance of concentric spherical shells which are held together through the repulsion of the nucleonic forces. Neutron spin pairs outside of the concentric spheres are held by their attraction to the concentric spheres. So all of the nuclear forces are involved in holding a nucleus together
|HOME PAGE OF applet-magic|